[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ac_cv_sys_largefile_opts undocumented?
|
From: |
dmitrii . pasechnik |
|
Subject: |
Re: ac_cv_sys_largefile_opts undocumented? |
|
Date: |
Sat, 27 Apr 2024 23:39:06 +0100 |
On Sat, Apr 27, 2024 at 02:26:24PM -0700, Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 2024-04-27 14:06, dmitrii.pasechnik@cs.ox.ac.uk wrote:
> > Thus I got questions whether a patch for a build system I submitted for
> > a project is OK, as it uses an undocumented variable (thus, perhaps,
> > unstable).
>
> Although it's poorly designed and not documented and not stable, the
> patch may be good anyway. What's the patch for?
It's for nauty, a well-known program to deal with graph isomorphisms
etc. I've made a Gentoo patch here https://bugs.gentoo.org/921138
and I wanted to upstream it.
Dima
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature