Re: FSF office adddress update

bug-gnulib

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: FSF office adddress update

From:	Bruno Haible
Subject:	Re: FSF office adddress update
Date:	Mon, 02 Sep 2024 18:55:14 +0200

Simon Josefsson wrote:
> The attached syntax-check rule will help us catch this problem in
> packages.

Yes, it does ;-) It already caught libtool:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-libtool/2024-09/msg00002.html

Bruno

[Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

Re: FSF office adddress update, Simon Josefsson, 2024/09/01
- Re: FSF office adddress update, Bruno Haible, 2024/09/01
  - Re: FSF office adddress update, Simon Josefsson, 2024/09/02
    - Re: FSF office adddress update, Bruno Haible <=
- Re: FSF office adddress update, Simon Josefsson, 2024/09/04
- Re: FSF office adddress update, Simon Josefsson, 2024/09/03
  - Re: [gnu-prog-discuss] FSF office adddress update, Jacob Bachmeyer, 2024/09/03
  - Re: [gnu-prog-discuss] FSF office adddress update, Vincent Lefevre, 2024/09/04
  - Re: [gnu-prog-discuss] FSF office adddress update, Richard Stallman, 2024/09/04
    - Re: FSF office adddress update, Simon Josefsson, 2024/09/05
    - Re: [gnu-prog-discuss] FSF office adddress update, Greg Farough, 2024/09/05
- Re: Re: FSF office adddress update, oset, 2024/09/05

Prev by Date: Re: operator precedence
Next by Date: doc: Mention a gmtime_r problem
Previous by thread: Re: FSF office adddress update
Next by thread: Re: FSF office adddress update
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread