[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Patch/base](HEAD) GSObjCSuper

From: Adam Fedor
Subject: Re: [Patch/base](HEAD) GSObjCSuper
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 09:13:58 -0600

On Wednesday, September 10, 2003, at 03:28 AM, David Ayers wrote:

       * Headers/Additions/GNUstepBase/GSObjCRuntime.h (GSObjCSuper):
       Added test for uninitialized superclass reference.

Commited to HEAD.
(And will commit to the branch if no one objects.)


I'm not certain though, whether we want to commit the previos patch:
2003-08-24  David Ayers  <d dot ayers at inode dot at>

       * Headers/Additions/GNUstepBase/GSObjCRuntime.h
       (GSObjCClass):  Allow nil values.
       (GSObjCIsInstance): Ditto.
       (GSObjCIsClass): New function.
       (GSClassNameFromObject): Ditto.
       (GSObjCIsKindOf):  Use GSObjCSuper() in favor of


(plus some other GSObjCRuntime usage followups that are already part of HEAD) to the branch, as we might have some subtle implicit semantic changes, but I think the should be minimal and only have effect for people dealing with MetaClasses and such.

If we want them on the branch, I can commit them.

I think we can commit this to the branch. Especially since these are (or may be) useful for GDL2 users. I don't want base-1.8.0 to be obsolete before it's released.

Anyway, I'll probably make another pre-release next week.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]