[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Patch/base](HEAD) GSObjCSuper

From: David Ayers
Subject: Re: [Patch/base](HEAD) GSObjCSuper
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 18:28:46 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4b) Gecko/20030507

Adam Fedor wrote:

On Wednesday, September 10, 2003, at 03:28 AM, David Ayers wrote:

       * Headers/Additions/GNUstepBase/GSObjCRuntime.h (GSObjCSuper):
       Added test for uninitialized superclass reference.

Commited to HEAD.
(And will commit to the branch if no one objects.)


I'm not certain though, whether we want to commit the previos patch:
2003-08-24  David Ayers  <d dot ayers at inode dot at>

       * Headers/Additions/GNUstepBase/GSObjCRuntime.h
       (GSObjCClass):  Allow nil values.
       (GSObjCIsInstance): Ditto.
       (GSObjCIsClass): New function.
       (GSClassNameFromObject): Ditto.
       (GSObjCIsKindOf):  Use GSObjCSuper() in favor of


Committed to the release branch.

I think we can commit this to the branch. Especially since these are (or may be) useful for GDL2 users. I don't want base-1.8.0 to be obsolete before it's released.

Well, it's not necessarily needed by GDL2, but it's useful for people using GSObjCRuntime functions in +load, but none the less, the guile tests passed.

Anyway, I'll probably make another pre-release next week.

Thanks for the warning. I'll see if I can get some more testing of the branch done.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]