Re: Request for review: NSHost patch

[Alex Perez]

Adam Fedor wrote:
> I think I remember looking at it and it looked OK. But I think I wanted  
> someone like Richard to look at it.  Jeremy has an assignment on file,  
> so it is OK to put in from that standpoint.

Richard, have you ever looked at this?

> On May 21, 2005, at 12:55 AM, Alex Perez wrote:
>
> > Did this patch ever get reviewed/applied?
> >
> > Jeremy Tregunna wrote:
> >
> > > Good morning;
> > >
> > > I've recently written a patch against NSHost to make it IPv6 aware,  
> > > and am curious to hear some of your thoughts about it.
> > >
> > > I've tried to keep from adding any new methods (though I did add one  
> > > to the "Private" category as you can see in the patch); and verified  
> > > no breakage here with IPv4 addressing, and IPv6 addressing appears 
> > > to  be working fine (again here, using KAME version 20010528/FreeBSD).
> > >
> > > Any suggestions, critisims are welcome.
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > -Jeremy Tregunna
> > > jtregunna@fuqn.ca
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> > > --
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Bug-gnustep mailing list
> > > Bug-gnustep@gnu.org
> > > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnustep
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Bug-gnustep mailing list
> > Bug-gnustep@gnu.org
> > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnustep