Re: [patch #4206] libobjc: Extend protocol hack to all gcc versions

[Adam Fedor]

We only have our own custom libobjc due to problems compiling on  
Windows. I've always wanted to get rid of it. As there are better  
compiler tools on Windows now it may even be possible to do this soon.

On Jul 27, 2005, at 6:48 AM, Jeremy Bettis wrote:

> Why is this my problem.
>
> Look at  
> http://wwwmain.gnustep.org/resources/downloads.php? 
> site=http%3A%2F%2Fftpmain.gnustep.org%2Fpub%2Fgnustep%2F
> Notice how it has listed libobjc as prereq on windows.
> See the link to  
> http://ftpmain.gnustep.org/pub/gnustep/libs/gnustep-objc-1.3.0.tar.gz
> Notice how that is NOT GCC's libobjc.
> See my patch to that code.
>
> I don't really care what libobjc GCC has because I have to use  
> gnustep's.
>
> Feel free to fix any of the steps that got us to this point, but don't  
> tell me that I am not using the right software when I followed the  
> published instructions.
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andrew Pinski"  
> <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
> To: "Jeremy Bettis" <jeremy@deadbeef.com>
> Cc: "Andrew Pinski" <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>; <bug-gnustep@gnu.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 2:42 PM
> Subject: Re: [patch #4206] libobjc: Extend protocol hack to all gcc  
> versions
>
>
> > > Gcc has a libobjc also, but the code I patched was from gnustep's CVS
> > > server, not gcc's.
> > >
> > > Let's take one step at a time.
> >
> > The GNUstep's libobjc really should be removed now as it does not  
> > contain
> > all the fixes which are in the GCC's CVS.  And the libobjc in GCC is  
> > upstream
> > so the bug should be submitted there first.  This might turn out to  
> > be a
> > front-end bug if you submit a bug to GCC's bug database.
> >
> > -- Pinski
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-gnustep mailing list
> Bug-gnustep@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnustep