bug-gnustep
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[bug #26437] Base should allow the usual "make && sudo make install"


From: Nicola Pero
Subject: [bug #26437] Base should allow the usual "make && sudo make install"
Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2009 21:25:58 +0000
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1.3) Gecko/20090824 Firefox/3.5.3

Follow-up Comment #7, bug #26437 (project gnustep):


> I suppose we could prompt the ubuntu package manager for 
> gnustep-make to submit a new filesystem layout file defining 
> where gnustep-config should be put to be in the PATH.

I actually think they should either use the FHS layout, so that
gnustep-config is in /usr/bin, or, if they use the GNUstep layout, they should
add /usr/GNUstep/System/Tools and /usr/GNUstep/Local/Tools to the PATH.

Having just gnustep-config in the PATH is pretty useless ... I mean when
users install Gorm, how are they going to run it if the Gorm executable is not
in the PATH ?

It's obvious that the location of GNUstep executables should be in the PATH
for any working installation.  That includes gnustep-config, but more
importantly includes all the GNUstep tools and applications that users are
likely to install and use.

I personally don't see much point in having gnustep-config in the PATH but
not having other GNUstep tools/applications in the PATH.

So, they really need to fix how they install and setup GNUstep so that
GNUstep tools/apps are in the PATH and users can use them :-)

Thanks

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?26437>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.gnu.org/





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]