Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] [gnu.org #829168] GNUzilla and IceCat for Windows?

[Jason Self]

Sure - if you want to come up with your own definition of free
software it can be whatever you want. People have come up with their
own definitions before: There's "Debian free" and "Fedora free", for
example, so that would be nothing new. However, a program with a
requirement of being distributed non-commercially wouldn't be "FSF
free" which is the point I was trying to make when the original
recommendation was made that people on Windows simply download & use
Firefox instead. Recommending that they use a program that isn't "FSF
free" is probably not a good idea.