[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] Is IceCat 24.0 secure?

From: Loic J. Duros
Subject: Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] Is IceCat 24.0 secure?
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 22:31:30 -0500
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux)

Great idea. It would be nice to have this. Would you like to volunteer
and, in the future, regularly send me an email with the list of
fixes/security status so that I can post on a page in

Building the next IceCat and LibreJS keep me busy enough, so more help,
not just development, but such work as documenting, as you suggest,
would be extremely helpful!

I don't think the gnu.org offers an easy way to securely allow someone
to post content on a single page only, unfortunately, but maybe it will
be worth at some point to set up a simple wiki app, even if a lot of the
documentation would actually end up linking to mozilla.org.

Thanks again for your suggestion!


Mauricio Fernandez Vitri <address@hidden> writes:

> That's good to know.
> It would be nice to see information about future (and past) versions
> and their security status in the main GNUzilla web site. This way
> everyone would know which version is secure and which one isn't, so
> they won't just use a free web browser, but a secure one also.
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 5:28 PM, Loic J. Duros <address@hidden> wrote:
>> We're working on the release of IceCat based off 27.0.1, actually.
>> Mauricio Fernandez Vitri <address@hidden> writes:
>>> Hello,
>>> I've done some research and found that there are security updates
>>> which fix more than 14 critical bugs for Firefox ESR [1].
>>> Aren't those critical bugs important enough to update IceCat? Would
>>> you please consider updating it to the latest ESR?
>>> Thanks for your work,
>>> Mauricio
>>> [1] http://www.mozilla.org/security/known-vulnerabilities/firefoxESR.html
>>> --
>>> http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
> --
> http://gnuzilla.gnu.org

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]