[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] SpyBlock should be a separate addon - ERRATA

From: David Englund
Subject: Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] SpyBlock should be a separate addon - ERRATA
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 23:42:43 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.5.0

On 2015-03-11 20:58, alexus / dotcommon wrote:
On 2015-03-11 19:50, alexus / dotcommon wrote:
On 2015-03-10 09:18, David Englund wrote:
SpyBlock is a Adblock Plus fork customized for, and inbuilt, in IceCat
by my judgement of reading

Read the AdBlock Plus
to understand that SpyBlock need to be developed as a separate addon
so those who use other web browsers than IceCat can use it.

There is also a without-whitelist fork of Adblock Plus, named
HackTheWeb (free software using the modified BSD license):

Not sure about the customizations used with the SpyBlock releases
included with IceCat are different respect to HackTheWeb.

Please, excuse me...

I mean Adblock Edge (not to HackTheWeb):


Yes, SpyBlock should be based on Adblock Edge. It makes it clear that the white list are removed as Adblock Edge is quite popular for that reason.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]