[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] No Flash - Proposed being part of IceCat

From: David Englund/Hedlund
Subject: Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] No Flash - Proposed being part of IceCat
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2015 02:10:25 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.5.0

On 2015-03-21 23:54, Ivan Zaigralin wrote:
IMHO, we should be removing some (or may be even all) addons from the
default icecat install, not adding more. I really like the fact that
upon the first run, icecat prompts the user to check/uncheck the privacy
features, and I am very happy about LibreJS being labeled as
/experimental/ (/ineffective/ would be closer to the mark). This
actually makes the whole practice somewhat palatable, and now I just
wish none of the privacy addons were on by default. Surely a user can
check a few boxes?

Also, SpyBlock should probably be described better here (that it blocks
ads, etc.)

Also, video addon should probably be added to that checkbox list.

On 03/21/2015 01:29 PM, David Englund wrote:
*HTML5 Video Everywhere!**Note:* "Some legacy sites force using Flash
player, you will need to install no-flash134
<https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/no-flash/> add-on to
support them." -

I strongly propose thatNo Flash
(https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/no-flash/) should be
part of future versions of IceCat.




This is a very good idea. I have changed my mind now and think that IceCat should be clean (as in Emacs clean).

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]