[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] Introducing Extension Signing: A Safer Add-on Experie

From: David Englund/Hedlund
Subject: Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] Introducing Extension Signing: A Safer Add-on Experience
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 05:31:37 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.5.0

On 2015-03-30 05:23, Svetlana A. Tkachenko wrote:
Such signing requirement doesn't let the user run a modified copy of an 
extension on their own computer, until the user figures out how to disable it. 
IceCat folks would probably just disable the signing requirement by default.


My understanding is that Firefox just will tell the user that an add-on that is going to be installed is either signed or not signed. But I have not read the article.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]