[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] #icecat need a IceCat representing channel owner

From: Nathan Follens
Subject: Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] #icecat need a IceCat representing channel owner
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2015 18:42:02 +0100


Why is this an issue exactly? I peeked at said IRC channel, and there were 15 users, including myself and a bot. I believe any and all time spent on this channel and who is or is not, should or should not be a channel owner, is completely wasted. To put it more bluntly: nobody uses IRC anymore, and nobody ever will again. (Idling for the sake of idling is not the same as participating.)

An XMPP MUC might be of more use, although even that would likely not attract many people.


Den to.. 12. nov., 2015, kl 16:48, David Hedlund <address@hidden> skreiv:
Urgent: Rubén, can you _please_ accept to become the representing channel owner so you can edit topics? Otherwise I have to ask Giuseppe Scrivano <address@hidden> for permission each time which I most likely will forget about like this time. This is very inconvenient. I'm not fine to wait with this any more. On 2015-08-14 00:00, David Englund/Hedlund wrote: > IceCat maintainer, Rubén Rodríguez, is known as quidam on > freenode.net. It has been suggested that Rubén get permission as > channel owner of #icecat > > #freenode 2015-08-13 > > 23:47:04) beloved: Fuchs: I asked this in #icecat recently: "Can you > please update the topic link? From > https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Collection:IceCat_extensions_(proposed) > to > https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Free_Software_Directory:IceCat_extensions_(proposed)" > (23:47:15) beloved: Fuchs: Who should I ask? > (23:47:57) Fuchs: beloved: probably someone representing icecat should > take that channel over > (23:48:01) Fuchs: then he or she could change it > (23:48:15) Fuchs: beloved: so if you could get one of the lead > developers poke staff, that would probably do > (23:48:30) beloved: Fuchs: quidam is the maintainer of GNU IceCat, hes > in the channel. > (23:48:55) beloved: Fuchs: I am the maintainer of the link that is > used in the topic though. > (23:49:13) Fuchs: beloved: lovely. Could he try to poke staff in here > or, if not successful, write an e-mail to projects at freenode dot > net with his role in the project, the project homepage, the channel > in question and his nickname? > (23:49:36) Fuchs: beloved: it would be better if the channel was > managed by someone representing the project than just have staff adapt > the link. Then you could also do other changes, if needed > (23:50:02) Fuchs: is giuseppe related to the project? > (23:50:03) fusrodah left the room (quit: ). > (23:50:11) Fuchs: if yes: he has +o in that channel and should be able > to edit the topic > (23:50:24) Fuchs: note that the above should still be done, to get a > better founder than freenode-staff > (23:51:36) beloved: Fuchs: Ok. What email address should quidam write to? > (23:51:45) Fuchs: beloved: projects at freenode dot net > > > -- > http://gnuzilla.gnu.org -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]