Re: about g++ 3.0

[Roman Sulzhyk]

"PeterPan" <address@hidden> wrote in message news:<address@hidden>...
> hi, 2 problems:
> 
>         1. All the document I saw told me iostream::overflow(int ch) should
> return non-EOF on success,
> but the code in g++ 3.0 assumed that it return ch (the input), did the
> standard changed ??
> 

        Yes, I saw this also - took a while to get down to it, because it
only shows up when you output single characters (i.e. endl) rather
than whole strings. I originally submitted this as a libstdc++ bug,
but then retracted it... Maybe it is a valid bug after all?

        Roman