[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug 738169] [NEW] .RD macro contains .ie without .el, breaking call
From: |
Colin Watson |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug 738169] [NEW] .RD macro contains .ie without .el, breaking caller's code |
Date: |
Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:15:39 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 11:56:48AM -0000, jimav wrote:
> The .RD macro in /usr/share/groff/*/tmac/m.tmac causes .ie / .el pairs
> to mis-behave IN THE USER'S CODE if the optional 'string' argument is
> not passed to the .RD macro.
>
> The problem seems to be a bug in the RD macro which contains ab .ie
> without a mathcing .el (it should be just .if, not .ie). This causes
> the next .el to be seen by the roff processor to be matched with the
> .ie inside the RD macro, even though the .el is in a enclosing block,
> such as the user's code.
>
> I will attach a small demo script and a patch.
(For bug-groff: demo script is at
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/groff/+bug/738169/+attachment/1920491/+files/demoscript.sh,
while the patch is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/groff/+bug/738169/+attachment/1920500/+files/patch.txt.)
Thanks for your report. I can reproduce it with groff 1.21, and the
same problem appears to be present in CVS HEAD, so forwarding upstream.
--
Colin Watson address@hidden
- Re: [Bug 738169] [NEW] .RD macro contains .ie without .el, breaking caller's code,
Colin Watson <=