[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug #61022] [ms] documention neglects to mention FP macro
From: |
G. Branden Robinson |
Subject: |
[bug #61022] [ms] documention neglects to mention FP macro |
Date: |
Tue, 1 Feb 2022 16:23:01 -0500 (EST) |
Update of bug #61022 (project groff):
Planned Release: 1.23.0 => None
_______________________________________________________
Follow-up Comment #8:
In the meantime, FP needs a new name--AT&T already seized it in the early
1980s.
8th edition ms(7) says:
> FP
> Set font positions for a family, e.g., "FP palatino"
This doesn't elucidate much, and I certainly don't plan to implement the AT&T
macro, but I do plan to alias it (along with other AT&T macros we don't
support) to `@not-implemented`.
The next most mnemonic choice would probably be `PF`, but that's already
(relatively) well known as a pic(1) boundary macro. Also see bug #60558.
If no one has a better idea, I propose `FF`. This is not taken as a _macro_
name (it is as a register), and AT&T doesn't squat on it either.
Although I do see that 4.2BSD added an `FP` macro for the exact purpose you're
using it.
Well, great. :-/ I really don't want to have to support "ATT" vs. "BSD"
modes but suddenly this looks more likely...
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?61022>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [bug #61022] [ms] documention neglects to mention FP macro,
G. Branden Robinson <=