[bug #64043] [ms] mixing formatting requests with macro calls produces different unspecified behavior with groff than with AT&T troff

[G. Branden Robinson]

Follow-up Comment #14, bug #64043 (group groff):

[comment #13 comment #13:]
> Sounds good.  While the bug has been Rejected for over a year, the
discussion seemed have been left in limbo, so I wanted to make sure everything
that might have been resolved has been resolved.

Fair.
 
> Only one other potentially loose thread that I see: one of your emails
includes the statement "I can see a reason for displays (and equations
displayed with EQ/EN) in ms documents to permit pre-heading space to
accumulate with inter-display distance.  For that matter, we could expose a
new register to enable user control of pre-heading vertical space."  This
appears not to have been done (s.tmac has had only four commits since that was
written, none of which say anything about a new register).  Should it be?

Not without an expression of demand, IMO.  Which doesn't rule out that I'll
feel the demand myself when crafting a future _ms_ document.  :)


    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?64043>

_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature