[bug #65967] [PATCH] [docs] Say "input" instead of "input file" where appropriate

[G. Branden Robinson]

Follow-up Comment #2, bug #65967 (group groff):


@@ -16315,7 +16315,7 @@ @node I/O
 @cindex read next file (@code{nx})
 @cindex file, next, read (@code{nx})
 @cindex next file, read (@code{nx})
-Stop processing the input file.  If @var{file} is specified, read it;
+Stop processing the input.  If @var{file} is specified, read it;
 otherwise, read the next pending input file, if any.
 @endDefreq


This one makes more sense as it was because the point of `nx` is to proceed to
the next _input file_, and to exit only if there is none.

As you have recast it, it is harder to perceive the difference between the
`nx` and `ex` requests.


    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?65967>

_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature