bug-grub
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Bug-grub Digest, Vol 83, Issue 19


From: hasan atizaz
Subject: Re: Bug-grub Digest, Vol 83, Issue 19
Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 18:27:51 +0500

i like to inform i am using fedora 11 i installed grub 2 it works like a charm, my motherboard is S975XBX2. it mapped the bios settings itself.

thankyou
hasan.

On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 9:01 PM, <address@hidden> wrote:
Send Bug-grub mailing list submissions to
       address@hidden

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
       http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-grub
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
       address@hidden

You can reach the person managing the list at
       address@hidden

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Bug-grub digest..."


Today's Topics:

  1. [bug #27862] No error message on incorrect command
     (Andrew Valencia)
  2. [bug #27862] No error message on incorrect command (Felix Zielcke)
  3. [bug #27862] No error message on incorrect command
     (Andrew Valencia)
  4. [bug #27863] Block lists and Multiboot no longer work
     (Andrew Valencia)
  5. [bug #27874] load_env and save_env default to
     /boot/grub/grubenv,       but grub-editenv doesn't (Andreas Kloeckner)
  6. [bug #27874] load_env and save_env default to
     /boot/grub/grubenv,       but grub-editenv doesn't (Felix Zielcke)
  7. grub 2 (difficulty, not a bug) (Roderick Worley)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:03:22 +0000
From: Andrew Valencia <address@hidden>
Subject: [bug #27862] No error message on incorrect command
To: Andrew Valencia <address@hidden>, Felix Zielcke
       <address@hidden>,     address@hidden
Message-ID: <address@hidden>
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8


Follow-up Comment #2, bug #27862 (project grub):

I think I've been using GRUB longer than you... this was the canonical way to
specify arguments when VSTa first adopted GRUB.  Admittedly, that was a while
ago.  Still, I hadn't guessed that you folks had not only switched to a
different way of specifying arguments, but had also made the old syntax mean
something new.  In any case, thanks for the quick response!


   _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

 <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?27862>

_______________________________________________
 Message sent via/by Savannah
 http://savannah.gnu.org/





------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:22:45 +0000
From: Felix Zielcke <address@hidden>
Subject: [bug #27862] No error message on incorrect command
To: Andrew Valencia <address@hidden>, Felix Zielcke
       <address@hidden>,     address@hidden
Message-ID: <address@hidden>
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8


Follow-up Comment #3, bug #27862 (project grub):

I have no doubts that you used GRUB Legacy more then me ;)
Ok I even bothered now to try this actually out.
Strange that it really understands kernel=/x
The official manual at least tells nothing about this, according to grep '='
grub.texi

   _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

 <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?27862>

_______________________________________________
 Nachricht geschickt von/durch Savannah
 http://savannah.gnu.org/





------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:26:29 +0000
From: Andrew Valencia <address@hidden>
Subject: [bug #27862] No error message on incorrect command
To: Andrew Valencia <address@hidden>, Felix Zielcke
       <address@hidden>,     address@hidden
Message-ID: <address@hidden>
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8


Follow-up Comment #4, bug #27862 (project grub):

Yeah, I'm a dinosaur. :->

Anyway, I really doubt people like me need to be well-served in what we
remember from the days of the 386.  Thanks again for the quick response.


   _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

 <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?27862>

_______________________________________________
 Message sent via/by Savannah
 http://savannah.gnu.org/





------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:27:55 +0000
From: Andrew Valencia <address@hidden>
Subject: [bug #27863] Block lists and Multiboot no longer work
To: Andrew Valencia <address@hidden>, Felix Zielcke
       <address@hidden>,     address@hidden
Message-ID: <address@hidden>
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8


Follow-up Comment #2, bug #27863 (project grub):

Thanks here too.  Without the "=" it just quietly returns a prompt (just like
with the "=").  But, in fact, on a whim I tried "boot" and it had indeed
loaded in the bits.  I don't know if it's intended that a kernel load in CLI
mode should be absolutely silent, but it works so I'm happy.


   _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

 <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?27863>

_______________________________________________
 Message sent via/by Savannah
 http://savannah.gnu.org/





------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 18:06:09 +0000
From: Andreas Kloeckner <address@hidden>
Subject: [bug #27874] load_env and save_env default to
       /boot/grub/grubenv,     but grub-editenv doesn't
To: Andreas Kloeckner <address@hidden>, address@hidden
Message-ID: <address@hidden>
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8


URL:
 <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?27874>

                Summary: load_env and save_env default to
/boot/grub/grubenv, but grub-editenv doesn't
                Project: GNU GRUB
           Submitted by: inducer
           Submitted on: Fr 30 Okt 2009 18:06:08 GMT
               Category: None
               Severity: Major
               Priority: 5 - Normal
             Item Group: None
                 Status: None
                Privacy: Public
            Assigned to: None
        Originator Name:
       Originator Email:
            Open/Closed: Open
        Discussion Lock: Any
                Release:
                Release: 1.96
        Reproducibility: Every Time
        Planned Release: None

   _______________________________________________________

Details:

If one wants to use grub-editenv, one needs to figure out which file is used
to save and load the environment. This information is not easily
available--not in help load_env, nor anywhere. This information should be
available in the docs, but also grub-editenv should have the same default as
load_env to alleviate the need for this piece of documentation in the first
place.




   _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

 <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?27874>

_______________________________________________
 Nachricht geschickt von/durch Savannah
 http://savannah.gnu.org/





------------------------------

Message: 6
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 18:50:45 +0000
From: Felix Zielcke <address@hidden>
Subject: [bug #27874] load_env and save_env default to
       /boot/grub/grubenv,     but grub-editenv doesn't
To: Felix Zielcke <address@hidden>, Andreas Kloeckner
       <address@hidden>,     address@hidden
Message-ID: <address@hidden>
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8


Follow-up Comment #1, bug #27874 (project grub):

grub-editenv defaults now to /boot/grub/editenv too and it prints that out
with --help.
Unfortunately this was commited after the 1.97 release was made.

I'm not sure about changing the help output for load_env
There it's actually $prefix/grubenv

   _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

 <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?27874>

_______________________________________________
 Nachricht geschickt von/durch Savannah
 http://savannah.gnu.org/





------------------------------

Message: 7
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 21:09:03 +1100
From: Roderick Worley <address@hidden>
Subject: grub 2 (difficulty, not a bug)
To: address@hidden
Message-ID:
       <address@hidden>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I'd like to be able to remove boot entries.
Currently, in my ubuntu9.10 system, the first Microsoft system to
appear is the first partition.
However if I select it, it wipes out my Vista system since it is the
"recovery" partition of my notebook.
However I'm told not to change grub.cfg

Can you make an easy way of not having certain entries appear?

Rod Worley




------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Bug-grub mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-grub


End of Bug-grub Digest, Vol 83, Issue 19
****************************************


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]