|Subject:||Re: [bug-gsrc] unification of code of gsrc and biosrc|
|Date:||Thu, 16 Jun 2016 00:07:30 -0700|
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 1:39 AM, Brandon Invergo <address@hidden> wrote:I'm all for it. I think the organization is a bit cleaner.On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 14:31 -0700, carl hansen wrote:
> TODO, soon
> incorporation of (good) parts of biosrc into gsrc, i.e. more logical file structure.
> Then package makefiles are compatable between them and can be copied
> between them.
> All those who wish to help, are welcome
> "The hobgoblin of software engineering is unnecessary redundancy."
Fortunately, I think it shouldn't have any harmful effect for the users
if it's implemented all at once.
Let me know what I can do to help (so as not to accidentally duplicate
effort or introduce conflicts). Sorry, I know I haven't been as active
lately; work has been occupying most of my time and energy lately.
We should also consider putting together a snapshot release soon. I
used to do it quarterly and there were people who reported using it.
Genomes are more important. But it would be good if you can test thesnapshot generating script, I tried but didn't get results I expected, notsure I was doing right thing.I will move forward on the other changes and ask you opinion of thembefore commitment.Carl
|[Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread]|