Re: [bug-gtypist] ideas, implementations, patches.

[Felix Natter]

Tim Marston <address@hidden> writes:

> Hi,

hello Tim,
hello clutton,

> On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 01:41:28PM -0700, geoffroy tremblay wrote:
>> Personally prefer the 2 line too, as a user ;)
>
> I'm also in favour of keeping the two-line approach, but I like the
> sound of adding the one-line approach!
>
> So lets make this optional via the command line (and config file, when
> we get that working in master).

I think the challenge is how to parametrize do_drill() (do_speedtest()
is already "one-line"): I think we want a separate do_drill_oneline()
function. The con is that we need to duplicate the logic like "word
processor adjustments", but it's not that bad.

Of course if clutton manages to parametrize do_drill() then
that should be ok, too (depending on how readable it is).

Cheers and Best Regards,
-- 
Felix Natter