[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: the smallest of nits

From: Dirk Herrmann
Subject: Re: the smallest of nits
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2001 15:40:09 +0100 (MET)

On Fri, 26 Jan 2001, Bill Schottstaedt wrote:

> I'm not sure you guys want this kind of bug reported but...
> I think load.c, continuations.c, keywords.c, and dynl.c need
> #ifdef HAVE_STRING_H
> #include <string.h>
> #endif

Thanks for the report.  However, one question:  Is it necessary to wrap
the #include within the #ifdef?  I thought string.h was part of ANSI C?

Unless someone tells me I am wrong, I will just add the #include
unconditionally to those files...

Best regards,
Dirk Herrmann

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]