[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Segmentation fault
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: Segmentation fault |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Oct 2007 10:26:44 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) |
Hi,
Neil Jerram <address@hidden> writes:
> I believe the patch below is the correct fix for this. Please test
> and/or comment!
Works like a charm!
> +2007-10-19 Neil Jerram <address@hidden>
> +
> + * standalone/test-use-srfi: Use -q to avoid picking up the user's
> + ~/.guile file.
Thanks for taking care of this one too!
(I had forgotten about it, which may be an indication that we should
really start using the bug tracker.)
> + ;; Tests that require the debugging evaluator...
> + (let ((dopts (debug-options)))
> + (debug-enable 'debug)
> +
> + (pass-if "unmemoizing a promise"
> + (display-backtrace
Could we hide the backtrace, because it's always a bit scary to see a
backtrace in the middle of the "PASS" lines? Something like:
(with-output-to-port (%make-void-port "w")
(lambda ()
...
(display-backtrace)
Alternatively, could `unmemoize-expr' somehow be used for the test?
Perhaps the `debug-enable' and `debug-disable' could be in a
`dynamic-wind', but that's not big deal.
Thanks,
Ludovic.
- Re: Segmentation fault, frank schwidom, 2007/10/10
- Re: Segmentation fault, Neil Jerram, 2007/10/18
- Re: Segmentation fault, Neil Jerram, 2007/10/18
- Re: Segmentation fault,
Ludovic Courtès <=
- Re: Segmentation fault, Neil Jerram, 2007/10/19
- Re: Segmentation fault, Ludovic Courtès, 2007/10/20
- Re: Segmentation fault, Neil Jerram, 2007/10/21
- Re: Segmentation fault, Ludovic Courtès, 2007/10/21
- Re: Segmentation fault, Neil Jerram, 2007/10/24
- Re: Segmentation fault, Ludovic Courtès, 2007/10/24
- Re: Segmentation fault, Neil Jerram, 2007/10/24
- Re: Segmentation fault, Neil Jerram, 2007/10/20
- Re: Segmentation fault, Ludovic Courtès, 2007/10/21
- Re: Segmentation fault, Neil Jerram, 2007/10/21