[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GUILE_CFLAGS contains warning options
|
From: |
Bruno Haible |
|
Subject: |
Re: GUILE_CFLAGS contains warning options |
|
Date: |
Tue, 22 Feb 2011 22:40:01 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.9 |
Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> However, why do you have -Wall in CPPFLAGS, instead of CFLAGS, in the
> first place? :-)
Because CPPFLAGS=-Wall is shorter to type than CFLAGS="-g -O2 -Wall",
and I know that -Wall has no effect when linking a program or library.
Bruno
--
In memoriam Sophie Scholl <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sophie_Scholl>
- GUILE_CFLAGS contains warning options, Bruno Haible, 2011/02/19
- Re: GUILE_CFLAGS contains warning options, Bruno Haible, 2011/02/19
- Re: GUILE_CFLAGS contains warning options, Andy Wingo, 2011/02/20
- Re: GUILE_CFLAGS contains warning options, Bruno Haible, 2011/02/20
- Re: GUILE_CFLAGS contains warning options, Ken Raeburn, 2011/02/20
- Re: GUILE_CFLAGS contains warning options, Ludovic Courtès, 2011/02/22
- Re: GUILE_CFLAGS contains warning options,
Bruno Haible <=
- Re: GUILE_CFLAGS contains warning options, Ludovic Courtès, 2011/02/23
- Re: GUILE_CFLAGS contains warning options, Bruno Haible, 2011/02/23
- Re: GUILE_CFLAGS contains warning options, Ludovic Courtès, 2011/02/27
- Re: GUILE_CFLAGS contains warning options, Bruno Haible, 2011/02/27
- Re: GUILE_CFLAGS contains warning options, Ludovic Courtès, 2011/02/27