[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#13848: Statically linking guile-2.0.
From: |
shookie |
Subject: |
bug#13848: Statically linking guile-2.0. |
Date: |
Sun, 10 Mar 2013 00:57:31 +0100 |
Oh, a present :)
On 10.03.2013, at 00:06, Andy Wingo <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Sat 09 Mar 2013 14:44, Jan Schukat <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Just tried it again on windows/mingw with the newer tarball:
>>
>> http://hydra.nixos.org/build/4290536/download/3/guile-2.0.7.157-929d1.tar.gz
>
> FWIW it seems hydra is totally down right now; of course that would
> happen as soon as ludo goes on holiday ;)
>
> Here is a tarball I just generated from make dist:
>
> http://wingolog.org/priv/guile-2.0.7.179-94c5.tar.gz
Will do that at some point tonight.
>
>> checking for gcc... gcc
>> checking whether the C compiler works... no
>> configure: error: in `/c/Users/shookie/guiletest/lib/guile-2.0':
>> configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables
>
> No idea what is happening here, this looks like a problem on your side.
Don't really see how, considering the old tar balls didn't have that problem
and that the log file definitely says that gcc gets called with a command line
option (-V) that would be illegal on any platform.
>
> I fixed a bunch of things today. BTW are you using the old mingw or are
> you using mingw32 or mingw64? It seems that the mingw64 project (which
> provides both 32- and 64-bit builds) is the current thing, but I don't
> really know.
>
I'm using standard mingw/msys for this, those have gcc 4.7 already. All the
compilers in cygwin (mingw or not) are still stuck at 4.5. And I assume all
other packages lack similarly behind.
> Anyway, please give the new tarball a roll and see how it works for you.
> Be sure to have a relatively new mingw. I built everything myself, with
> all default options (except --enable-threads=pthreads in bdw-gc, and
> enabling dynamic builds in gmp), and it builds with only some warnings
> about iconv (filed with gnulib). I can't get it to run under wine
> however, and that must mean something is pretty wrong...
>
> Happy hacking,
>
> Andy
> --
> http://wingolog.org/
- bug#13848: Statically linking guile-2.0., (continued)
- bug#13848: Statically linking guile-2.0., Ludovic Courtès, 2013/03/02
- bug#13848: Statically linking guile-2.0., Jan Schukat, 2013/03/03
- bug#13848: Statically linking guile-2.0., Jan Schukat, 2013/03/04
- bug#13848: Statically linking guile-2.0., Ludovic Courtès, 2013/03/05
- bug#13848: Statically linking guile-2.0., Jan Schukat, 2013/03/05
- bug#13848: Statically linking guile-2.0., Ludovic Courtès, 2013/03/05
- bug#13848: Statically linking guile-2.0., Jan Schukat, 2013/03/05
- bug#13848: Statically linking guile-2.0., Ludovic Courtès, 2013/03/06
- bug#13848: Statically linking guile-2.0., Jan Schukat, 2013/03/09
- bug#13848: Statically linking guile-2.0., Andy Wingo, 2013/03/09
- bug#13848: Statically linking guile-2.0.,
shookie <=
- bug#13848: Statically linking guile-2.0., shookie, 2013/03/09
- bug#13848: Statically linking guile-2.0., Andy Wingo, 2013/03/10
- bug#13848: Statically linking guile-2.0., shookie, 2013/03/10
- bug#13848: Statically linking guile-2.0., Andy Wingo, 2013/03/10
- bug#13848: Statically linking guile-2.0., shookie, 2013/03/10
- bug#13848: Statically linking guile-2.0., shookie, 2013/03/10
- bug#13848: Statically linking guile-2.0., Andy Wingo, 2013/03/10
- bug#13848: Statically linking guile-2.0., shookie, 2013/03/10
- bug#13848: Statically linking guile-2.0., shookie, 2013/03/10
- bug#13848: Statically linking guile-2.0., Andy Wingo, 2013/03/11