[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#14849: (system vm coverage) `line-execution-counts' misleading outpu
bug#14849: (system vm coverage) `line-execution-counts' misleading output
Tue, 21 Jun 2016 09:09:02 +0200
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)
I have tried this one on master and it exhibits the results you expect,
not the buggy results. I added the test to the test suite. I don't
plan on devoting resource to fixing this bug in 2.0 though, so I'm
closing it for now. Feel free to reopen if you hvae a patch to fix :)
On Fri 12 Jul 2013 16:47, address@hidden (Taylan Ulrich B.) writes:
> The following shell/guile transcript showcases a minimal test-case for
> when a tail-call fools the code-coverage module into thinking that the
> line with the tail-call was not executed.
> The result in the Guile transcript, $1, is an alist from line numbers
> (starting from zero) to execution counts.
> Converting the relevant coverage-data object into LCOV data via
> `coverage-data->lcov', as advertised in (info "(guile) Code
> Coverage"), then to HTML via LCOV's genhtml(1), will result in the
> relevant line being colored red and contribute negatively to the total
> line-coverage percentage.
> === BEGIN TRANSCRIPT ===
> $ cat /tmp/test.scm
> (define (tail-call-test)
> (display "foo\n")
> (define (tail-call-target)
> (display "bar\n"))
> $ guile
> GNU Guile 126.96.36.199-10454
> Copyright (C) 1995-2013 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> Guile comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details type `,show w'.
> This program is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it
> under certain conditions; type `,show c' for details.
> Enter `,help' for help.
> scheme@(guile-user)> (begin
> ... (load "/tmp/test.scm")
> ... (call-with-values
> ... (lambda ()
> ... ((@ (system vm coverage) with-code-coverage)
> ... ((@ (system vm vm) the-vm))
> ... tail-call-test))
> ... (lambda (data . values)
> ... ((@ (system vm coverage) line-execution-counts) data
> ;;; <stdin>:0:4095: warning: possibly unbound variable `tail-call-test'
> $1 = ((5 . 1) (4 . 1) (2 . 0) (1 . 1) (0 . 1))
> === END TRANSCRIPT ===
|[Prev in Thread]
||[Next in Thread]|
- bug#14849: (system vm coverage) `line-execution-counts' misleading output,
Andy Wingo <=