[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Thu, 23 Jun 2016 16:13:57 +0200
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)
Andy Wingo <address@hidden> skribis:
> On Thu 24 Mar 2016 09:45, address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>> Mark H Weaver <address@hidden> skribis:
>>> It turns out the manual already has the following text in the ‘gensym’
>>> entry, which I think is sufficient.
>>> The symbols generated by ‘gensym’ are _likely_ to be unique, since
>>> their names begin with a space and it is only otherwise possible to
>>> generate such symbols if a programmer goes out of their way to do so.
>>> Uniqueness can be guaranteed by instead using uninterned symbols
>>> (*noteSymbol Uninterned::), though they can’t be usefully written out
>>> and read back in.
>>> What do you think?
>> Oh indeed, I guess I had overlooked that.
> I just pushed something to master to error when serializing an
> uninterned symbol. Otherwise compiling an uninterned symbol effectively
> interns it! I am not sure that we can apply such a fix in 2.0 though as
> who knows, maybe someone is compiling something with symbols made with
> make-symbol. WDYT? If you agree we can close this bug.
That makes sense to me.