bug#38398: non-obvious SCM_EOF_VAL rationale

[tomas]

On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 12:05:34PM +0000, Zefram via Bug reports for GUILE, 
GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language wrote:

[...]

> But please don't get sidetracked.  This wasn't a feature request for
> "#eof" [...]

To be fair, you contributed strongly to this side-tracking. By waving
a big red flag:

  "This poor design precludes RnRS specifying read syntax for any
   EOF object [...]"

you yourself drew attention to the underlying issues of the design
instead of keeping things focused to the documentation.

I agree that the doc could improve in this case...

Cheers
-- tomás

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature