[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Distro name
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: Distro name |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Jan 2013 17:56:15 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130005 (Ma Gnus v0.5) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) |
Andreas Enge <address@hidden> skribis:
> Am Dienstag, 15. Januar 2013 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:
>> So I’ll rename the (distro ...) modules to (gnu ...), because that’s
>> nicer and more meaningful (“a distro of the GNU system”).
>
> Even though it contains non-gnu packages?
Well, the famous “GNU System” was always supposed to contain non-GNU
packages.
Plus we’re just talking about a module name space, and using ‘gnu’ at
the beginning is just a way to claim ownership of that name space, not
of the packages that happen to be provided by those modules.
And module names are not really read from left to right; the naming
convention is usually (OWNER FEATURE), or (OWNER CATEGORY FEATURE).
This is all fairly meta. :-)
How does that sound?
Ludo’.
- Re: Distro name, (continued)
Re: Distro name, Nikita Karetnikov, 2013/01/02
Re: Distro name, Ludovic Courtès, 2013/01/15
Re: Distro name, Ludovic Courtès, 2013/01/17