[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: #!/usr/bin/env perl
From: |
Mark H Weaver |
Subject: |
Re: #!/usr/bin/env perl |
Date: |
Sun, 24 Feb 2013 21:49:05 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) |
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Enge <address@hidden> writes:
> (has-env (string-suffix? "/env" interp))
I think we might want to make this test more restrictive. I'm looking
at a package (guile-figl) that includes an 'env' script in its build
directory, analogous to 'pre-inst-env' in Guix. This makes me worry
that the test above will have false positives.
In practice, the path used is (almost?) always "/usr/bin/env".
I suspect it would be safer to check for that exact string.
What do you think?
Mark
- Re: #!/usr/bin/env perl, (continued)
- Re: #!/usr/bin/env perl, Ludovic Courtès, 2013/02/22
- Re: #!/usr/bin/env perl, Andreas Enge, 2013/02/23
- Re: #!/usr/bin/env perl, Ludovic Courtès, 2013/02/23
- Re: #!/usr/bin/env perl, Andreas Enge, 2013/02/23
- Re: #!/usr/bin/env perl, Ludovic Courtès, 2013/02/23
- Re: #!/usr/bin/env perl, Andreas Enge, 2013/02/23
- Re: #!/usr/bin/env perl, Ludovic Courtès, 2013/02/23
- Re: #!/usr/bin/env perl, Andreas Enge, 2013/02/23
Re: #!/usr/bin/env perl,
Mark H Weaver <=