[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#22883: gpg2 vs. gpg
From: |
ng0 |
Subject: |
bug#22883: gpg2 vs. gpg |
Date: |
Tue, 7 Jun 2016 12:58:31 +0000 |
On 2016-06-07(01:25:44+0200), Werner Koch wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 10:08, address@hidden said:
>
> > Nevertheless, we could configure GPG 2.x with --enable-gpg2-is-gpg, if
> > that’s what Werner recommends.
>
> It would help to avoid trouble in the future. Debian will also install
> gpg2 as gpg and provide 1.4 only a non-mandatory package gnupg1.
>
>
> Shalom-Salam,
>
> Werner
I can add Gentoo to the list of gpg2 -> gpg symlinking systems, though this
is expected with 2.x version and GnuPG having this as quasi default:
~$ ls -al /usr/bin/gpg*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 4 May 20 13:45 /usr/bin/gpg -> gpg2
.......
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 5 May 20 13:45 /usr/bin/gpgv -> gpgv2
--
♥Ⓐ ng0
For non-prism friendly talk find me on
psyced.org / loupsycedyglgamf.onion
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
bug#22883: Trustable "guix pull", Mike Gerwitz, 2016/06/04