[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#24099: A policy on how to choose the installed documentation formats
From: |
ng0 |
Subject: |
bug#24099: A policy on how to choose the installed documentation formats. |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Jul 2016 10:21:48 +0000 |
I don't think we have what this thread talks about covered in the
manual.
If we do have though, consider this bug obsolete.
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-01/msg00603.html
> > Info > HTML > man > txt > PDF > PS ?
> Roughly, yes.
Not the same message, but in the thread:
> What about installing only HTML?
>
> I find that HTML (and Info, and man) is more convenient to read on-line
> than PDFs. We rarely include PDF documentation in packages.
>
> Of course, avoiding PDF/PS/DVI allows us to remove the dependency
> on TeX Live. Last, from discussions I heard at the Reproducible
> Build Summit, I think DVIs and maybe PS/PDFs are not
> bit-reproducible out-of-the-box.
>
> WDYT?
>
> Maybe we should have a policy on how to choose the installed
> documentation formats.
>
> Ludo’.
--
♥Ⓐ ng0
Current Keys: https://we.make.ritual.n0.is/ng0.txt
For non-prism friendly talk find me on http://www.psyced.org
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- bug#24099: A policy on how to choose the installed documentation formats.,
ng0 <=