[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#30437: closed (Re: bug#30437: No “.guix-profile/bin/python” after ‘g
bug#30437: closed (Re: bug#30437: No “.guix-profile/bin/python” after ‘guix package -i python’)
Mon, 12 Feb 2018 20:55:54 +0100
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux)
address@hidden (GNU bug Tracking System) writes:
> From: Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden>
> Subject: Re: bug#30437: No “.guix-profile/bin/python” after ‘guix package -i
> To: address@hidden
> Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 20:00:57 +0100 (38 minutes, 1 second ago)
> User-agent: mu4e 0.9.18; emacs 25.3.1
> Efraim Flashner <address@hidden> writes:
>> On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 06:23:07PM +0100, Danny Milosavljevic wrote:
>>> Hi Mathieu,
>>> On Mon, 12 Feb 2018 17:52:41 +0100
>>> Mathieu Lirzin <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> > I think it would work better if when installing address@hidden, a ‘python’
>>> > executable would be available in the PATH. Maybe there is a technical
>>> > reason for not doing so, but I find its absence rather confusing.
>>> For backward compatibility, the 'python' executable always has to be Python
>>> A lot of old scripts specify just "/usr/bin/env python" in the shebang.
>>> On the other hand if your script supports Python 3 you know it.
>> We do also have the 'python-wrapper' package which uses python3 as
It is nice to have a ‘python-wrapper’ package as a workaround, but this
doesn't explain why the ‘python’ package shouldn't do it automatically.
Doing so would be far more convenient for casual users.
> Closing because it’s not a bug.
IMHO that was a bit quick to close. I still consider this as a wishlist
GPG: F2A3 8D7E EB2B 6640 5761 070D 0ADE E100 9460 4D37