[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#22533: Python bytecode reproducibility

From: Ludovic Courtès
Subject: bug#22533: Python bytecode reproducibility
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2018 10:25:40 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux)


Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden> skribis:

> Is it a bad idea to override the timestamps in the generated binaries?
> I think that we could avoid the recency check then, which was an
> obstacle to resetting the timestamps of the source files.

I think it’s good if we can fix Python itself to honor SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH
for its timestamps, but it’s also OK to patch timestamps in generated

We do that already in gzip headers, with ‘reset-gzip-timestamp’.

Thanks for tackling this!


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]