[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#35034: One libgit2 derivation fails on armhf, another succeeds
From: |
Danny Milosavljevic |
Subject: |
bug#35034: One libgit2 derivation fails on armhf, another succeeds |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Mar 2019 22:40:22 +0100 |
Hi Mark,
On Thu, 28 Mar 2019 16:38:27 -0400
Mark H Weaver <address@hidden> wrote:
> unless 'package-for-guile-2.0' is somehow modifying the
> 'libgit2' derivation.
>
> Any idea what's going on here?
Not really, *but* I've recently replaced Python by Guile in libgit2
tests.
Maybe that broke something - especially if package-for-guile-2.0 somehow
either provides both guile versions as native inputs or selects one
incompatible with the "generate.scm" I wrote.
Here, (ice-9 textual-ports) seems to be not found. Does it not exist in
guile 2.0 ? (I wasn't aware we still used guile 2.0 for something...)
pgpS0Xmszlp5r.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature