[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#35586: GNOME
From: |
pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) |
Subject: |
bug#35586: GNOME |
Date: |
Mon, 6 May 2019 11:05:34 +0200 |
User-agent: |
NeoMutt/20180716 |
On Mon, May 06, 2019 at 03:51:54AM -0400, Raghav Gururajan wrote:
> On 5 May 2019 16:48, "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" <address@hidden> wrote:
> > You can also type both Epiphany and (your language’s translation of)
> > Web in the GNOME Activities search bar to find Epiphany. The same
> > goes for Nautilus. The terminal command is also still epiphany or
> > nautilus.
> >
> > I do not know if it is possible to give a package two names; I believe
> > it is not.
>
> I understand what you are saying. It appears epiphany is the old name
> (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNOME_Web). Dev must have used epiphany now
> a days as a habit.
>
> Also, the previous blog link you sent me, recommends to use generic names.
>
Maybe gnome-web could be the real package’s name and there could be a
package called epiphany that propagates gnome-web, like the gnome
meta-package does? Same for nautilus etc.
Regards,
Florian
- bug#35586: GNOME, Raghav Gururajan, 2019/05/05
- bug#35586: GNOME, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz), 2019/05/05
- bug#35586: GNOME, Raghav Gururajan, 2019/05/05
- bug#35586: GNOME, Raghav Gururajan, 2019/05/05
- bug#35586: GNOME, Raghav Gururajan, 2019/05/06
- bug#35586: GNOME,
pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) <=
- bug#35586: GNOME, Raghav Gururajan, 2019/05/06
- bug#35586: GNOME, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice, 2019/05/06
- bug#35586: GNOME, Raghav Gururajan, 2019/05/06
- bug#35586: GNOME, Raghav Gururajan, 2019/05/07
- bug#35586: GNOME, Raghav Gururajan, 2019/05/11