[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally buil
From: |
Jan Nieuwenhuizen |
Subject: |
bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Jul 2019 08:28:55 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) |
Mark H Weaver writes:
Hi Mark,
>> I have added a very similar set of two patches to wip-cu-binaries,
>> branched @ ef809e3ac036eccc5f9c9edd8fb661d14ae15f2f.
>>
>> They give the same md5sum for me as the wip-binaries branch that
>> branched off of master; so mine are at
>> http://lilypond.org/janneke/guix/20190722/
>
> I built these, and here are the results:
>
> mhw@jojen /gnu/store/hd3lk0f08a0sq40qqa6yv1q9gbk7gxww-bootstrap-tarballs-0$
> sha256sum *
> b5915c71ff5ea722864e1097ce1e7ed50fd68ad7544521f2dd6969173c260276
> guile-static-stripped-2.2.4-i686-linux.tar.xz
> 1acd8f83e27d2fac311a5ca78e9bf11a9a1638b82469870d5c854c4e7afaa26a
> linux-libre-headers-stripped-4.14.67-i686-linux.tar.xz
> 021543d9bb6af55f39e68d69692e3cb74646ced2cad0bb9ac0047ef81e9d7330
> mescc-tools-static-stripped-0.5.2-0.bb062b0-i686-linux.tar.xz
> fb32090071b39fc804fb9a7fba96f0bc5eb844a0efd268fb24c42e6bfa959de0
> mes-minimal-stripped-0.19-i686-linux.tar.xz
> 9ee954dc19db5c8d4113c73a702fd8f79f26c51024220f2617d0572c0a85e69c
> static-binaries-0-i686-linux.tar.xz
>
> Do these match what you built?
Well...
08:16:12 janneke@dundal:~/src/guix/wip-cu-binaries [env]
$ sha256sum /gnu/store/hd3lk0f08a0sq40qqa6yv1q9gbk7gxww-bootstrap-tarballs-0/*
adce360f68ed0083c7356c267c24271fa4907f8082c9d47db28b603f9da5e763
/gnu/store/hd3lk0f08a0sq40qqa6yv1q9gbk7gxww-bootstrap-tarballs-0/guile-static-stripped-2.2.4-i686-linux.tar.xz
1acd8f83e27d2fac311a5ca78e9bf11a9a1638b82469870d5c854c4e7afaa26a
/gnu/store/hd3lk0f08a0sq40qqa6yv1q9gbk7gxww-bootstrap-tarballs-0/linux-libre-headers-stripped-4.14.67-i686-linux.tar.xz
021543d9bb6af55f39e68d69692e3cb74646ced2cad0bb9ac0047ef81e9d7330
/gnu/store/hd3lk0f08a0sq40qqa6yv1q9gbk7gxww-bootstrap-tarballs-0/mescc-tools-static-stripped-0.5.2-0.bb062b0-i686-linux.tar.xz
fb32090071b39fc804fb9a7fba96f0bc5eb844a0efd268fb24c42e6bfa959de0
/gnu/store/hd3lk0f08a0sq40qqa6yv1q9gbk7gxww-bootstrap-tarballs-0/mes-minimal-stripped-0.19-i686-linux.tar.xz
c80cdd17b0a24eebdd75570ff72c4ec06e129bd702ac008186b57f6301c448e7
/gnu/store/hd3lk0f08a0sq40qqa6yv1q9gbk7gxww-bootstrap-tarballs-0/static-binaries-0-i686-linux.tar.xz
...for mescc-tools and mes: yes. I have put them all up here:
http://lilypond.org/janneke/guix/20190722
> For the sake of completeness, I built these by running
>
> ./pre-inst-env guix build bootstrap-tarballs --system=i686-linux
>
> from a git checkout at commit 5a6465e41a84b4320940d33709b80d78c1aff9d0.
/me too
>> After this commit should come the update-commit, using them in
>> bootstrap.scm.
>
> Right, except those commits should be applied to the tip of
> 'core-updates', and not until we're sure that these new bootstrap
> binaries are good.
Yes.
> Ludovic, what do you think?
FWIW, I'm working on a mes-0.20 release that supports Nyacc-0.99.0 (and
hopefully 1.0.0) and mescc-tools-0.6 and building on Debian ootb.
There's no real reason to update bootstrap tarballs for those versions
and I cannot promise a release date yet.
Further work on mes-0.21 should bring the Reduced Binary Seed bootstrap
to ARM (lots of work still) and replace the `static-binaries' with Gash,
reducing the size of our bootstrap binaries once again by ~50%.
janneke
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.com
- bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones, Mark H Weaver, 2019/07/20
- bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2019/07/21
- bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones, Mark H Weaver, 2019/07/21
- bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2019/07/22
- bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2019/07/22
- bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2019/07/22
- bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones, Mark H Weaver, 2019/07/22
- bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2019/07/22
- bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones, Mark H Weaver, 2019/07/23
- bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones,
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <=
- bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones, Ludovic Courtès, 2019/07/23