[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#40558: (no subject)
From: |
elaexuotee |
Subject: |
bug#40558: (no subject) |
Date: |
Sat, 09 May 2020 19:47:48 +0900 |
User-agent: |
mblaze/0.5.1 |
I encountered a similar issue while trying to package something with a
texlive-union input. Tracking down the issue has killed way too many hours.
FWIW, the `working.tex' minimal example is also giving me similar problems:
$ guix describe
Generation 28 5月 07 2020 01:10:02 (current)
guix bed695a
repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git
branch: master
commit: bed695aa94cd85800ec2c6296fb2d13e7ac29133
$ guix environment --pure -e '((@ (gnu packages tex) texlive-union) `(,(@
(gnu packages tex) texlive-amsfonts)))'
$ pdflatex working
...
! Math formula deleted: Insufficient symbol fonts.
\) ->\relax \ifmmode \ifinner $
\else \@badmath \fi \else \@badmath \fi
l.4 Hello! \(y = x^2\)
...
With the patch to texlive-amsfonts the above typesets just fine; however,
metafont ends up generating cmmi10.657pk and cmr10.657pk font files. Is this
expected? Typsetting it from the texlive installation of my foreign distro
doesn't call out to metafont at all.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- bug#40558: (no subject),
elaexuotee <=