[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#45911: authorized-fields is not/badly documented
From: |
raingloom |
Subject: |
bug#45911: authorized-fields is not/badly documented |
Date: |
Sat, 23 Jan 2021 06:39:03 +0100 |
On Wed, 20 Jan 2021 09:49:09 +0100
Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> raingloom <raingloom@riseup.net> skribis:
>
> > I'm still confused about what the proper way to store the config
> > info is. Like how I should even store it as Scheme source code.
>
> Did you see this section and do you find it helpful?
>
>
> https://guix.gnu.org/manual/en/html_node/Getting-Substitutes-from-Other-Servers.html
>
> Ludo’.
I have, that's how I found out where the setting even is.
An issue that I only now noticed is that it doesn't explain where to
obtain the signing key from, or the new behaviour of `guix archive
--authorize`.
If no one wants to fix it, I'll submit a patch once I'm done setting up
Snapper and some backups.
Edit after this sat in my queue for a few days:
Okay, so I figured out that I should use a G-Expression if I want to
compute the file, instead of just include it. Still not sure how to
store it as Scheme data, but I have an untested idea involving the
"pipe" syntax for symbols.
Thanks for the pointers!
- bug#45911: authorized-fields is not/badly documented, raingloom, 2021/01/15
- bug#45911: authorized-fields is not/badly documented, Ricardo Wurmus, 2021/01/16
- bug#45911: authorized-fields is not/badly documented, Ludovic Courtès, 2021/01/20
- bug#45911: authorized-fields is not/badly documented,
raingloom <=
- bug#45911: authorized-fields is not/badly documented, Ricardo Wurmus, 2021/01/23
- bug#45911: authorized-fields is not/badly documented, raingloom, 2021/01/25
- bug#45911: authorized-fields is not/badly documented, Ricardo Wurmus, 2021/01/26