[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#33848: Store references in SBCL-compiled code are "invisible"
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
bug#33848: Store references in SBCL-compiled code are "invisible" |
Date: |
Fri, 02 Apr 2021 17:13:23 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) |
Hi Mark,
Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org> skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:
>> What could have been nice is if there’s a way to mark specific strings
>> as being ASCII, or if there’s a “byte vector” data type compatible with
>> strings, for instance.
>
> Do we know that all strings containing store references will be
> representable in ASCII?
The basename part of /gnu/store/* is guaranteed to be pure ASCII. Now,
you’re right that file names that come after could be non-ASCII, though
that’s very unlikely. We’d have to look at concrete examples I guess.
Ludo’.
- bug#33848: Store references in SBCL-compiled code are "invisible", (continued)
- bug#33848: Store references in SBCL-compiled code are "invisible", Mark H Weaver, 2021/04/06
- bug#33848: Store references in SBCL-compiled code are "invisible", Ludovic Courtès, 2021/04/08
- bug#33848: Store references in SBCL-compiled code are "invisible", Mark H Weaver, 2021/04/13
- bug#33848: Store references in SBCL-compiled code are "invisible", Ludovic Courtès, 2021/04/14
- bug#33848: Store references in SBCL-compiled code are "invisible", Leo Famulari, 2021/04/14
- bug#33848: Store references in SBCL-compiled code are "invisible", Mark H Weaver, 2021/04/15
- bug#33848: Store references in SBCL-compiled code are "invisible", Pierre Neidhardt, 2021/04/16
bug#33848: Store references in SBCL-compiled code are "invisible", Mark H Weaver, 2021/04/01
- bug#33848: Store references in SBCL-compiled code are "invisible",
Ludovic Courtès <=