bug-guix
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#51454: Progress bar in Org source blocks


From: zimoun
Subject: bug#51454: Progress bar in Org source blocks
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2021 18:52:42 +0100

Hi,

On Wed, 3 Nov 2021 at 18:05, <excalamus@tutanota.com> wrote:

> My goal has been to clean up the guix command output as seen in an org-babel 
> results block.  I'm blogging about Guix using org-babel and Org's export 
> functionality. I want the shell output as seen in the final html to be a 
> reasonable approximation of the shell output a user would see if the command 
> were run in something like xterm.  Based on feedback from people in the Org 
> community, I thought there might be a way to toggle off certain characters.

I understand.  Somehow, the output of Guix CLI is dynamic where Org
babel captures static text (the last output).  Therefore, maybe you
could demo using Gifs or something in this flavor.

> > And I do not think it is an issue about Guix.  Instead, it is an issue about
> > dealing with outputs and Org-mode (Babel).
> >
> I agree that handling this in org makes sense. When I asked the Org people, 
> they had said it was a Guix issue. And with what we found with NO_COLOR, fair 
> enough. You also raise a good point, however, that the characters originate 
> upstream. Anything Guix might do would be a work around and work arounds are 
> probably best handled in Emacs.

Some special characters (as coloring) are from Guix and it should be
possible to turn them off.  However, others are from progress-bars;
some from Guix itselfs, other from guile-git.  Therefore, I am not
sure what you are asking, I mean, are you asking to be able to turn
off all the progress-bars?


> >  for instance, something along these lines...
> >
> Thank you for the example. I was unaware of the Emacs function 
> ansi-color-apply-on-region.  The rest can probably be handled with 
> replace-match.

Yes, my example was just... an example.  I am sure one could come with
more complex filters for formatting adequately.

Cheers,
simon





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]