[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#54945: installer should have a no-graphics boot option
From: |
pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) |
Subject: |
bug#54945: installer should have a no-graphics boot option |
Date: |
Sat, 16 Apr 2022 19:31:15 +0200 |
On Sat, Apr 16, 2022 at 05:32:38PM +0200, raingloom wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Apr 2022 22:44:58 +0200
> "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" <pelzflorian@pelzflorian.de> wrote:
> >[…]
> > I believe uvesafb makes the graphics work on any
> > x86_64 or x86 machine, so no save-graphics GRUB entry is needed. But
> > maybe I’m wrong and uvesafb isn’t a panacea.
> >[…]
> Hmm, it did end up working, even without the amdgpu trick. Finally had
> an excuse to try the TUI installer.
> I guess we can close this for now, but I still think that a safe
> graphics mode could be a good idea.
Is there reason to believe installer’s graphics don’t work on some PC?
Regards,
Florian
- bug#54945: installer should have a no-graphics boot option, raingloom, 2022/04/14
- bug#54945: installer should have a no-graphics boot option, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz), 2022/04/15
- bug#54945: installer should have a no-graphics boot option, raingloom, 2022/04/15
- bug#54945: installer should have a no-graphics boot option, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz), 2022/04/15
- bug#54945: installer should have a no-graphics boot option, raingloom, 2022/04/16
- bug#54945: installer should have a no-graphics boot option,
pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) <=
- bug#54945: installer should have a no-graphics boot option, raingloom, 2022/04/16
- bug#54945: installer should have a no-graphics boot option, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz), 2022/04/18
- bug#54945: installer should have a no-graphics^W nomodeset boot option, raingloom, 2022/04/18