[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#53355: guix shell --check: confusing error message
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
bug#53355: guix shell --check: confusing error message |
Date: |
Fri, 20 May 2022 23:37:01 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) |
Hi Chris,
A friendly ping. :-)
Ludo’.
Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> skribis:
> Hi Chris,
>
> Did you have a chance to look into it?
>
> https://issues.guix.gnu.org/53355
>
> TIA. :-)
>
> Ludo’.
>
> Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> skribis:
>
>> Hi Chris,
>>
>> Thanks for debugging this!
>>
>> Chris Marusich <cmmarusich@gmail.com> skribis:
>>
>>> From c3eea81846ae71a246e6b592be74062f4bf26474 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>> From: Chris Marusich <cmmarusich@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2022 14:15:14 -0800
>>> Subject: [PATCH] environment: Prevent PS1 from clobbering output in 'check'.
>>>
>>> Fixes: <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/51466>.
>>>
>>> * guix/scripts/environment.scm (child-shell-environment): In the script
>>> executed the child shell, set PS1 to an empty value and then echo three
>>> sentinel lines to try to "flush" the original PS1 value before printing the
>>> environment variables. In the parent process, read and discard all lines up
>>> to and including the last sentinel line. After that, read the remaining
>>> lines
>>> as usual.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> + ;; Why print "GUIX_FLUSH" a few times? We are trying to "flush" the
>>> + ;; original PS1 value to the port so we can read it (and discard it)
>>> + ;; before we start reading the environment variables from the port.
>>> If we
>>> + ;; don't do this, the original PS1 value can sometimes get interleaved
>>> + ;; into the output, which interferes with our parsing logic. It's a
>>> hack,
>>> + ;; but in practice it seems to do the job. If you know of a more
>>> graceful
>>> + ;; solution, please implement it! See:
>>> https://issues.guix.gnu.org/51466
>>> + "PS1=; for i in 1 2 3; do echo GUIX_FLUSH_$i; done; \
>>> +env || /usr/bin/env || set; echo GUIX-CHECK-DONE; read x; exit\n")
>>
>> So you confirm that a single “echo” is not enough, right?
>>
>> Perhaps we should unroll the ‘for’ loop for portability, to be on the
>> safe side. Initially I tested with Bash, Zsh, and Fish:
>>
>> https://issues.guix.gnu.org/51285#0-lineno49
>>
>> I think Fish has a very non-POSIX syntax, hence the suggestion to avoid
>> ‘for’.
>>
>> I realized that setting PS1 could interfere with the logic below that
>> checks for PS1. And since it doesn’t seem to help, perhaps we can
>> remove “PS1=;”?
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> Sorry to answer with yet more questions!
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ludo’.
- bug#53355: guix shell --check: confusing error message,
Ludovic Courtès <=