bug#57899: emacs-jsonrpc hash mismatch

[Fredrik Salomonsson]

Hi,

After I did a guix pull emacs-jsonrpc fails to build. Getting this:

---✀----------------------------------------------------------------------------
building /gnu/store/gbcl55whjaxbvipa8jk7k4jbihnccn2a-jsonrpc-1.0.15.tar.drv...
\sha256 hash mismatch for 
/gnu/store/6x4d5gd3hlml4kcgj9xcqwpjrgq3059f-jsonrpc-1.0.15.tar:
  expected hash: 1hx378rg12jz2zm105cvrqk0nqyzsn04l59d903l98d6lbd96rsw
  actual hash:   0biwvkvd48xqvigzs00yz4mk847xzyzm7p0lkns58fxph9nkg4h5
hash mismatch for store item 
'/gnu/store/6x4d5gd3hlml4kcgj9xcqwpjrgq3059f-jsonrpc-1.0.15.tar'
build of /gnu/store/gbcl55whjaxbvipa8jk7k4jbihnccn2a-jsonrpc-1.0.15.tar.drv 
failed
View build log at 
'/var/log/guix/drvs/gb/cl55whjaxbvipa8jk7k4jbihnccn2a-jsonrpc-1.0.15.tar.drv.gz'.
cannot build derivation 
`/gnu/store/j5vdxaxnh92qvf931axizfabk5y7x1k6-emacs-jsonrpc-1.0.15.drv': 1 
dependencies couldn't be built
guix home: error: build of 
`/gnu/store/j5vdxaxnh92qvf931axizfabk5y7x1k6-emacs-jsonrpc-1.0.15.drv' failed 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

After some investigating it doesn't look like the emacs-jsonrpc package 
description
has changed. Odd thing is that the source doesn't seem to have changed
either, I diffed it against the emacs-jsonrpc derivation I currently
have installed and both source files match.

I downloaded the source from elpa and checked the hash:
---✀----------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ wget https://elpa.gnu.org/packages/jsonrpc-1.0.15.tar
$ guix hash jsonrpc-1.0.15.tar
0biwvkvd48xqvigzs00yz4mk847xzyzm7p0lkns58fxph9nkg4h5
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

And it matches the hash guix get as well and not what is in the package
definition.

I'm using:

  guix ee0768c
    repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git
    branch: master
    commit: ee0768c7924134f7b4b215670c2a3ae481268fab

Not sure what is going on. Or what is the best approach forward.

Any ideas what could be wrong?

-- 
s/Fred[re]+i[ck]+/Fredrik/g