[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#72061: Discrepancy when running ‘guix pull’ from different machines
From: |
Simon Tournier |
Subject: |
bug#72061: Discrepancy when running ‘guix pull’ from different machines |
Date: |
Mon, 26 Aug 2024 18:38:54 +0200 |
Hi Konrad,
CC: Ludo, do you think it comes from the commit c14b8636fb: “records: Do
not inline the constructor.”?
On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 at 21:35, Konrad Hinsen <konrad.hinsen@fastmail.net> wrote:
>> Could you share the channels.scm file?
>
> Attached.
Thanks. Do you know what the current Guix revision? It should have no
effect but who knows. :-)
I mean, guix-daemon had been updated. Has the Guix command launching
“guix time-machine” been updated too?
>> Because the mention of ’guix-science’ means third-party channels, I
>> guess. And maybe there is something tricky when mixing different
>> specific pinned channels.
>
> I thought about that as well, but the behavior should still be the same
> on every machine, right? For me, the attached channels.scm works fine.
Yes. But there is a "Computing Guix derivation“ in the middle. :-)
If I read correctly, this error message:
> guix time-machine --channels=channels.scm -- …
> guix-science/build-system/node.scm:119:2: error: #{
> %make-build-system-procedure/abi-check}#: unbound variable
> hint: Did you forget a `use-modules' form?
comes from the macro ’define-record-type*’; see module (guix records).
(symbol-append (string->symbol " %")
(syntax->datum #'ctor)
'-procedure/abi-check)))
That’s weird, because all seems correctly included, i.e., the variable
should be bounded. Well, the revisions from the channels.scm file
reads:
guix-science: 12eba5aa0c5cbf357c476ef7872e0d562d054eff
CommitDate: Wed May 22 17:40:02 2024 +0200
guix: 325fed4c1514bffd084355455710fcc3f1c8da2c
CommitDate: Tue Jul 16 10:28:05 2024 -0500
And the file guix/records.scm had been modified by:
records: Do not inline the constructor.
c14b8636fbac9826115f4524d500536d54c15625
CommitDate: Sat May 4 19:14:24 2024 +0200
Change-Id: Ifd7b4e884e9fbf21c43fb4c3ad963126ef5cb476
Is the current failing Guix running a revision older than May?
Cheers,
simon
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- bug#72061: Discrepancy when running ‘guix pull’ from different machines,
Simon Tournier <=