[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] System V Shared memory interface

From: Neal H Walfield
Subject: Re: [PATCH] System V Shared memory interface
Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 15:50:04 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.15i

> > Basically, half of shmid_ds and retreived with
> > `shmctl (id, IPC_STAT, &shmid_ds)', e.g. number of current attaches,
> > shm_atime, shm_dtime and shm_ctime.
> Blech.  Why not just keep track of that information in a file
> somewhere?

If I interpret what Roland says correctly, he is quite against this.

Attachment: pgpvwa2OmYJT2.pgp
Description: PGP signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]