[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: might not be glibc after all

From: Marcus Brinkmann
Subject: Re: might not be glibc after all
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 16:34:55 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.18i

On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 03:35:45PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> it might not be a glibc problem after all.  I have gone back as far as
> 2001-02-26, and that was broken already.  I am now trying to compile the
> version corresponding to the current working Debian package 2001-02-16.
> If that is broken as well, we have a tool chain problem.

We are lucky, 2001-02-16 seems to work with my build chain. So the critical
change seems to be somewhere inbetween.  I will try intermediate versions.
I just hope I get not confused with so many versions of glibc floating


`Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' Debian http://www.debian.org brinkmd@debian.org
Marcus Brinkmann              GNU    http://www.gnu.org    marcus@gnu.org

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]