[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] part type interface
From: |
Roland McGrath |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] part type interface |
Date: |
Sun, 7 Oct 2001 18:35:08 -0400 (EDT) |
> > Why is this not sufficient? This is how every other shared library
> > dependency works.
>
> I was just under the impression that a stub was the right thing to do
> in this case. I am drawing this conclusion from what I have seen in
> libc. Consider msync: it returns always returns failure, however,
> when this is functionality finally implemented, all application will
> magically start taking advantage of it.
Not necessarily. stub functions are ignored by autoconf checks,
so programs with compile-time checks don't try to use msync.
- Re: [PATCH] part type interface, (continued)
- Re: [PATCH] part type interface, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/10/07
- Re: [PATCH] part type interface, Roland McGrath, 2001/10/07
- Re: [PATCH] part type interface, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/10/07
- Re: [PATCH] part type interface, Roland McGrath, 2001/10/07
- Re: [PATCH] part type interface, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/10/07
- Re: [PATCH] part type interface, Neal H Walfield, 2001/10/07
- Re: [PATCH] part type interface, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/10/07
- Re: [PATCH] part type interface, Neal H Walfield, 2001/10/07
- Re: [PATCH] part type interface, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/10/07
- Re: [PATCH] part type interface,
Roland McGrath <=
- Re: [PATCH] part type interface, Roland McGrath, 2001/10/07