[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: patch: use err, not errno

From: James Morrison
Subject: Re: patch: use err, not errno
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 19:47:06 -0800 (PST)

--- Roland McGrath <roland@gnu.org> wrote:
> Several of those instances used perror and you didn't change them.
> Changing them to use `error' instead of perror or perror and exit
> is fine.
> I'd have to examine all the surrounding code more closely to be
> sure there
> aren't other cases where the code calls something that uses errno.

I figured the code would need a second look, I tried to be as
conscientious as I could.  I hadn't thought of perror to error, but
it would make things more consistant.  Are there any more consistancy
things I should look for while reading through more code?

James Morrison
   University of Waterloo
   Computer Science - Digital Hardware
   2A co-op

Anyone refering this as 'Open Source' shall be eaten by a GNU

Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Sports - live college hoops coverage

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]