[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: run.c translator
From: |
Thomas Bushnell, BSG |
Subject: |
Re: run.c translator |
Date: |
18 Mar 2002 21:00:03 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 |
Marcus Brinkmann <Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de> writes:
> However, there is a fundamental problem in all this because we can't
> properly signal an EOF condition. After all, we only have one file
> descriptor open to the run translator, and how can we signal that there is
> nothing left to read to it? When we could, I would use two pipes instead
> one bidirectional, and close it. This would be enough to let the running
> program know about it. But how to get the end of file signal to the foo
> translator in the first place? The filter program should do it somehow.
> Do we have some icky (or even proper) RPC that we can use for this? Am I
> missing something obvious?
You want the "shutdown" call, which should do the right thing.
- run.c translator, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/03/18
- Re: run.c translator,
Thomas Bushnell, BSG <=
- Re: run.c translator, Niels Möller, 2002/03/19
- Re: run.c translator, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/03/19
- Re: run.c translator, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/03/20
- Re: run.c translator, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/03/20
- Re: run.c translator, Roland McGrath, 2002/03/20
- Re: run.c translator, Niels Möller, 2002/03/20
- Re: run.c translator, Roland McGrath, 2002/03/20
- Re: run.c translator, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/03/20
- Re: run.c translator, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/03/20
- Re: run.c translator, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/03/20